Why Hollywood Hypocrisy Rages On

We lastly discovered a method to make Hollywood, Inc. cease saying, “Don’t Say Homosexual.”
The trade rallied round that Faux Information narrative following Florida laws designed to guard Okay-Third graders from sexual instruction in public faculties.
Movie star after celeb blasted the choice, with many repeating what they falsely claimed couldn’t be mentioned.

‘Homosexual, Homosexual, Homosexual, Homosexual’: Mark Hamill’s Childish Response To Florida Regulation Defending 5-Yr-Olds https://t.co/8IpulWNmgK pic.twitter.com/M651DRpWHL
— Day by day Wire (@realDailyWire) March 9, 2022

The fraudulent meme additionally made its approach into the Oscars ceremony, Hollywood’s greatest evening.
Co-hosts Amy Schumer, Regina Corridor and Wanda Sykes all repeated the “Don’t say homosexual” narrative in the beginning of the low-rated telecast.

Beyoncé Opens Oscars On Tennis Court docket, As Amy Schumer, Regina Corridor & Wanda Sykes Joke About Golden Globes, Off-Air Awards And Don’t Say Homosexual https://t.co/VrjVa12wxc
— Deadline Hollywood (@DEADLINE) March 28, 2022

A humorous factor occurred to this department of Hollywood activism. It didn’t stop Warner Bros. from removing gay-themed dialogue from the latest “Fantastic Beasts” film to appease Chinese language censors.
References to a homosexual relationship in “Unbelievable Beasts: The Secrets and techniques of Dumbledore” have been edited out of the film by Warner Bros. for the movie’s launch in China. Solely six seconds of the film’s 142-minute runtime have been eliminated. Dialogue that was edited out alluded to the romantic previous between male characters Dumbledore (Jude Regulation) and Grindelwald (Mads Mikkelsen). “Harry Potter” creator J.Okay. Rowling revealed Dumbledore was homosexual in 2009, however the films had by no means explicitly referenced the character’s sexuality till this third “Unbelievable Beasts” entry.
That information broke April 11, however 72-plus hours later Hollywood stays principally, if not totally, silent on the difficulty. No Tweets from celeb activists slamming the choice. No updates from Schumer, Corridor or Sykes on their passionate concern.
None of that is stunning.
RELATED: Pink v. Pink: Hypocrisy on Steroids
Hollywood hypocrisy is the one fixed in La La Land. Field workplace grosses ebb and circulate. Stars who have been crimson scorching yesterday discover their careers cooling at the moment. And actors routinely flash their means to say one factor after which do the exact opposite.
Want examples?

Actors promote a inexperienced revolution however incessantly burn more energy than most People. Others preach about Local weather Change then hop on the nearest private jet.
They railed in opposition to President Donald Trump for placing “kids in cages” however fell silent when it occurred below President Joe Biden.
Actresses march in opposition to the Patriarchy however stand down when a fellow actress is fired for no good reason.
Stars flee states with strict abortion legal guidelines however look the opposite approach when studios play footsie with China, a vigorous human rights abuser.

That’s only a brief record. The larger query stays. How do they get away with it, repeatedly?
It’s easy. They by no means, ever face repercussions for his or her hypocrisy.
RELATED: Alyssa Milano’s MeToo Hypocrisy Has Plenty of Company
Most of that falls on the media’s toes. Reporters, each the laborious information selection and leisure scribes, not often if ever convey up these conflicts. If a star made a pro-life speech on the Oscars, she or he would possible face a withering press pounding hours later.
If that very same star commits an act of nuclear-grade hypocrisy, nevertheless, those self same reporters will look the opposite approach.
Working example?
What number of reporters challenged Leonardo DiCaprio on his eco-lecture in the course of the 2016 Oscar ceremony? It’s hardly a secret that the “Revenant” star doesn’t follow what he preach.
It’s simply the alternative.
Subscribe at the moment!
That will make a worthy query for the famous person, no?
No, apparently.
The identical holds true for different Hollywood hypocrisies. Media sorts refuse to carry the highly effective to account for each deceit.
So when the trade collectively ignores a serious studio erasing homosexual dialogue from a wannabe blockbuster it’s clear they received’t be challenged on the matter.
Why? There are two apparent explanations.
One, it could embarrass the celebrities in query, little question. That might put the reporters’ entry to them in jeopardy shifting ahead. No extra puff items tied to their subsequent movie or streaming challenge. And it might harm their ties to the studio in query.
Two, reporters typically agree with liberal actors and their progressive worldviews. So to embarrass them would harm the motion as a complete. And so they’d moderately not do this.
RELATED: Gay Groups Silent on Kimmel’s Homophobic Jokes
This lack of accountability extends past media corruption. Inexperienced vitality teams equally stand down over Hollywood’s eco-hypocrisy. Have any singled DiCaprio out for his eco-hypocrisy?
Equally, GLAAD received’t publicly ask why Hollywood activists received’t converse out in opposition to the “Unbelievable Beasts” censorship?
Did Time’s Up howl at stars ignoring the sexual abuse allegation in opposition to then-candidate Joe Biden in 2020? In fact not. To be truthful, the group routinely ignores Democrats behaving badly, particularly Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

In truth, past conservative media shops noting the hypocrisy stars face no actual blowback for his or her actions.
That’s why we’ll maintain seeing new variations of it for the foreseeable future.

Source link