How Masks Make You Sick Instead of Protecting You


In the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, 80% of U.S. states mandated masks to sluggish the unfold of SARS-CoV-2, however accumulating analysis reveals masks mandates and use don’t decrease the unfold of the virus.1 Whereas guidelines requiring masks did enhance compliance, they did not translate to decrease transmission progress charges, whether or not neighborhood unfold of SARS-CoV-2 was low or excessive.

Even earlier than COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, masks mandates had been put in place with out ever correctly evaluating efficacy, however that did not cease them from dividing communities and getting used as a type of advantage signaling and a visual reminder of compliance with the “new regular.”

Now, with analysis exhibiting not solely that masks do not shield you however may very well make you sick, the rationale behind their widespread mandated utilization should be questioned.

Masks Mandates Did not Decrease COVID-19 Circumstances

Utilizing CDC information, researchers with the College of Louisville calculated whole COVID-19 case progress and masks use for the U.S. No important variations had been present in case progress between mandate and non-mandate states during times of low or excessive transmission.

“Surges had been equivocal,” they famous, concluding, “Masks mandates and use should not related to slower state-level COVID-19 unfold throughout COVID-19 progress surges.”2 Whereas stating that their findings “don’t help the speculation that SARS-CoV-2 transmission charges lower with larger public masks use,” they did notice that “masks might promote social cohesion as rallying symbols throughout a pandemic.”3

Equally dismal outcomes from masks mandates had been demonstrated in Europe. A research printed in Cureus analyzed information from 35 European international locations, together with morbidity, mortality and masks utilization, over a six-month interval. The researchers famous:4

“Masks mandates had been applied in nearly all world international locations and in most locations the place masks weren’t compulsory, their use in public areas was really useful … These mandates and proposals came about although most randomized managed trials carried out earlier than and through the COVID-19 pandemic concluded that the position of masks in stopping respiratory viral transmission was small, null, or inconclusive.”

When the information had been analyzed, the research additionally revealed that the widespread use of masks didn’t scale back COVID-19 transmission. Worse, a reasonable optimistic correlation was discovered between masks utilization and deaths in Western Europe, which “means that the common use of masks might have had dangerous unintended penalties.”5

Masks Mandates in Colleges Did not Cut back COVID-19 Circumstances

As a part of the federal government sponsored propaganda marketing campaign, a broadly cited CDC research, printed in October 2021, reported that counties with out faculty masks mandates had bigger will increase in COVID-19 case charges in kids after the beginning of faculty in contrast with counties that had faculty masks mandates.6

The research was used to help faculty masks mandates, however a crew of researchers revisited the analysis, incorporating a bigger pattern measurement and longer research interval. The up to date research,7 printed in Might 2022, used practically six instances extra information in comparison with the unique research and located no important relationship between masks mandates in U.S. faculties and COVID-19 case charges. Based on the researchers:8

“We failed to determine a relationship between faculty masking and pediatric circumstances utilizing the identical strategies however a bigger, extra nationally various inhabitants over an extended interval. Our research demonstrates that observational research of interventions with small to reasonable impact sizes are vulnerable to bias brought on by choice and omitted variables. Randomized research can extra reliably inform public well being coverage.”

On Twitter, surgeon and public coverage researcher Dr. Marty Makary identified that the CDC’s authentic research appeared to incorporate cherry-picked information and the company refused to publish an replace utilizing the extra in depth information:9

“This research demonstrates how the CDC was cherry-picking information to help their faculty masks dogma. The article states that CDC’s MMWR journal rejected publishing this re-analysis. Most certainly as a result of it uncovered the CDCs salami-slicing of knowledge & use of science as political propaganda.”

It must be famous {that a} earlier CDC research discovered masks necessities for college kids had little impact on COVID-19 incidence in Georgia faculties, whereas improved air flow, equivalent to opening a window, decreased circumstances greater than masks mandates for employees and lecturers.10

The Foegen Impact: Masks Mandates Elevated COVID-19 Deaths

A profoundly vital research was carried out by German doctor Dr. Zacharias Fögen to search out out whether or not obligatory masks use influenced the COVID-19 case fatality charge in Kansas from August 1, 2020, to October 15, 2020.11 He selected the state of Kansas as a result of, whereas it issued a masks mandate, counties had been allowed to both choose in or out of it.

His evaluation revealed that counties with a masks mandate had considerably greater case fatality charges than counties with out a masks mandate. “These findings recommend that masks use may pose a but unknown menace to the person as an alternative of defending them, making masks mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention,” he concluded.

That menace, he defined, could also be one thing known as the “Foegen impact” — the concept that deep re-inhalation of droplets and virions caught on facemasks may make COVID-19 an infection extra probably or extra extreme.

“The basics of this impact are simply demonstrated when carrying a facemask and glasses on the similar time by pulling the higher fringe of the masks over the decrease fringe of the glasses. Droplets seem on the masks when respiratory out and disappear when inhaling.”

“Within the “Foegen impact,” the virions unfold (due to their smaller measurement) deeper into the respiratory tract. They bypass the bronchi and are inhaled deep into the alveoli, the place they’ll trigger pneumonia as an alternative of bronchitis, which might be typical of a virus an infection.

Moreover, these virions bypass the multilayer squamous epithelial wall that they can’t go into in vitro and most certainly can not go into in vivo. Due to this fact, the one possible method for the virions to enter the blood vessels is thru the alveoli.”12

Carrying Masks Might Be Associated to Lengthy COVID

Fögen defined that carrying masks might find yourself growing your general viral load as a result of, as an alternative of exhaling virions out of your respiratory tract and ridding your physique of them, these virions are caught within the masks and returned. This may also have the impact of accelerating the variety of virions that go by the masks, such that it turns into greater than the quantity that may have been shed with out a masks.

The truth that “hypercondensed droplets and pure virions within the masks is perhaps blown outwards throughout expiration, leading to aerosol transmission as an alternative of droplet transmission” is one other problem that might make transmission worse as an alternative of higher, and using “extra protecting” masks might additionally backfire, making COVID-19’s long-term results worse. Fögen defined:13

“Using “higher” masks (e.g., FFP2, FFP3) with a better droplet-filtering capability most likely ought to trigger a fair stronger “Foegen impact” as a result of the variety of virions which might be probably re-inhaled will increase in the identical method that outward shedding is decreased.

One other salient level is that COVID-19-related long-term results and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in kids might all be a direct reason for the “Foegen impact.” Virus entry into the alveoli and blood with out being restricted to the higher respiratory tract and bronchi and might trigger injury by initiating an (auto) immune response in most organs.”

Clear Dangers of Extended Masks Use

Two professional reviews spoke out in opposition to using masks for youngsters in 2021. The primary, a psychology report,14 acknowledged that masks are more likely to be inflicting psychological hurt to kids and interfering with growth.15 “The extent of psychological hurt to younger individuals is unknown,” the report acknowledged, “as a result of distinctive nature of the ‘social experiment’ at the moment underway in faculties, and in wider society.”16

The second report centered on well being, security and well-being,17 noting potential everlasting bodily injury to the lungs brought on by fibrosis from inhalation of fibrous nanoparticles.

“There are actual and important risks of respiratory an infection, oral well being deterioration and of lung damage, equivalent to pneumothorax, owing to moisture buildup and in addition publicity to probably dangerous ranges of an asphyxiant fuel (carbon dioxide [CO2]) which might trigger severe damage to well being,” the authors defined.18

Usually, the CO2 then dissipates into the air round you earlier than you are taking one other breath. Within the open air, carbon dioxide usually exists at about 400 components per million (ppm), or 0.04% by quantity.

The German Federal Environmental Workplace set a restrict of CO2 for closed rooms of two,000 ppm, or 0.2% by quantity. Should you’re carrying a facemask, the CO2 can not escape because it often does and as an alternative turns into trapped within the masks. In a research printed in JAMA Pediatrics, researchers analyzed the CO2 content material of inhaled air amongst kids carrying two sorts of masks, in addition to carrying no masks.19

Whereas no important distinction in CO2 was discovered between the 2 sorts of masks, there was a major elevation when carrying masks in comparison with not carrying them. CO2 in inhaled air underneath surgical and filtering facepiece masks got here in between 13,120 ppm and 13,910 ppm, “which is greater than what’s already deemed unacceptable by the German Federal Environmental Workplace by an element of 6,” the researchers famous.20

Additionally vital, this stage was reached after solely three minutes, whereas kids put on masks at college for a imply of 270 minutes at a time. Even the kid who had the bottom measured CO2 stage had a measurement three-fold larger than the closed room CO2 restrict of 0.2%. Nonetheless, youthful kids appeared to have the very best CO2 values; a stage of 25,000 ppm was measured from a 7-year-old carrying a facemask.21

Bacterial An infection Threat, Issues With Social Studying

The total penalties of extended masks use are solely starting to be understood. The College of Louisville researchers famous, nevertheless, that utilizing a masks for greater than 4 hours per day “promotes facial alkalinization and inadvertently encourages dehydration, which in flip can improve barrier breakdown and bacterial an infection danger.”22 Different reported opposed results embody:23

Enhance in complications and sweating

Decreased cognitive precision

Affiliation with medical errors

Interference with social studying in kids

Obscured nonverbal communication

Distorted verbal speech

Removing of visible cues, which is detrimental to individuals with listening to loss

After a lawsuit was introduced by Leslie Manookian’s Well being Freedom Protection Fund (HFDF), U.S. District Decide Kathryn Kimball Mizelle lastly voided the CDC’s U.S. masks mandate on airplanes and public transit in April 2022.24 The U.S. Division of Justice (DoJ) has appealed the court docket order,25 nevertheless, making it clear that they do not intend to surrender on masks mandates with out a battle. In response, HFDF issued the next assertion:26

“DoJ’s assertion [that it would appeal] is perplexing to say the least and sounds prefer it comes from well being coverage advocates not authorities legal professionals. The ruling by the US District Courtroom ruling is a matter of legislation, not CDC choice or an evaluation of ‘present well being circumstances.’

If there may be in actual fact a public well being emergency with clear and irrefutable science supporting CDC’s masks mandate, does it not warrant pressing motion? Why would DoJ and CDC not instantly enchantment?

HFDF is left with no possibility however to conclude that the Masks Mandate is known as a political matter and in no way about pressing public well being points or the calls for of sound science. Whereas DoJ and CDC play politics with People’ well being and freedoms, HFDF trusts particular person People to make their very own well being choices.

HFDF is assured that People possess ample frequent sense and schooling to know that there are actual questions on masks efficacy and danger and that CDC’s coverage displays neither.”

You possibly can help the Well being Freedom Protection Fund and push again in opposition to the DoJ and CDC by taking to social media. Please comply with and/or just like the HFDF on the next platforms, share their content material, and invite your followers to do the identical:

Instagram: @healthfreedomdefensefund
Twitter: @theHFDF
Fb: @healthfreedomdefensefund
Telegram: @HealthFreedomDefense
MeWe: Health Freedom Defense Fund




Source link